<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woodstoves &#8211; The Finalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/woodstoves-the-finalists/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/woodstoves-the-finalists</link>
	<description>a new studio, a new home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:24:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/woodstoves-the-finalists/comment-page-1#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/?p=247#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Hey Alex,

My project is on hold for the foreseeable future...however, in the meantime, I did decide to do a little remodel of the existing home. I added a RAIS wood-burning insert, which is really nice. I haven&#039;t fully installed it, but when the project is done, I&#039;ll post on the blog. 

I think that if I were only using the stove sporadically, I&#039;d go for the better-designed/smaller fire box. If it were my primary heat source...getting tiny 12&quot; logs would be a real pain in the butt!

Shawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Alex,</p>
<p>My project is on hold for the foreseeable future&#8230;however, in the meantime, I did decide to do a little remodel of the existing home. I added a RAIS wood-burning insert, which is really nice. I haven&#8217;t fully installed it, but when the project is done, I&#8217;ll post on the blog. </p>
<p>I think that if I were only using the stove sporadically, I&#8217;d go for the better-designed/smaller fire box. If it were my primary heat source&#8230;getting tiny 12&#8243; logs would be a real pain in the butt!</p>
<p>Shawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex catchpoole</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/woodstoves-the-finalists/comment-page-1#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>alex catchpoole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/?p=247#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Hi Shawn,

Just wondering if you have chosen the stove and which one you went for.
We are just finishing a small cottage and realize we need a stove... 
did the wood size win out over aesthetics?
Great website, Thanks Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shawn,</p>
<p>Just wondering if you have chosen the stove and which one you went for.<br />
We are just finishing a small cottage and realize we need a stove&#8230;<br />
did the wood size win out over aesthetics?<br />
Great website, Thanks Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Lanvers</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/woodstoves-the-finalists/comment-page-1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lanvers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/?p=247#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply Shawn.  

Money is a part of the equation, as it always is for everything I suppose.  I don&#039;t really care too much about a couple grand difference though, considering the longevity and use I&#039;ll get out of the unit.  

My biggest concern is actually chopping wood 18&quot; in length vs. 12&quot;.  Seems to me that I&#039;d be using 33% less energy (muscle energy!), with the 18&#039;s.....

I also looked at some Wittus stoves, made by a Danish company.  Check them out at Wittus.com  The Zeus looked attractive to me and at 2795 + shipping was somewhat doable.... It also could take up to 16&quot; logs, so maybe that is the compromise?!?!?

Let me know how things go, and what direction you eventually go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply Shawn.  </p>
<p>Money is a part of the equation, as it always is for everything I suppose.  I don&#8217;t really care too much about a couple grand difference though, considering the longevity and use I&#8217;ll get out of the unit.  </p>
<p>My biggest concern is actually chopping wood 18&#8243; in length vs. 12&#8243;.  Seems to me that I&#8217;d be using 33% less energy (muscle energy!), with the 18&#8242;s&#8230;..</p>
<p>I also looked at some Wittus stoves, made by a Danish company.  Check them out at Wittus.com  The Zeus looked attractive to me and at 2795 + shipping was somewhat doable&#8230;. It also could take up to 16&#8243; logs, so maybe that is the compromise?!?!?</p>
<p>Let me know how things go, and what direction you eventually go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/woodstoves-the-finalists/comment-page-1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/?p=247#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Hey Thomas,

From an aesthetic perspective, the Morso is a much more handsome unit. However, I have heard some feedback that it doesn&#039;t handle ash as well, and it appears to use a smaller log. The Morso is also quite a bit more expensive, so if your budget is a factor, then the Scan may be the right choice.

I still haven&#039;t been able to solidify financing, so we&#039;re in a holding pattern. I&#039;m not sure if the artist or pragmatist will win out in the stove debate. It&#039;s a central feature of the home, so I may end up biting the bullet.

Shawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Thomas,</p>
<p>From an aesthetic perspective, the Morso is a much more handsome unit. However, I have heard some feedback that it doesn&#8217;t handle ash as well, and it appears to use a smaller log. The Morso is also quite a bit more expensive, so if your budget is a factor, then the Scan may be the right choice.</p>
<p>I still haven&#8217;t been able to solidify financing, so we&#8217;re in a holding pattern. I&#8217;m not sure if the artist or pragmatist will win out in the stove debate. It&#8217;s a central feature of the home, so I may end up biting the bullet.</p>
<p>Shawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Lanvers</title>
		<link>http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/woodstoves-the-finalists/comment-page-1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Lanvers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shawnbusse.com/private/houseblog/?p=247#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I have been looking at stoves as well....  

I love the Scan 60 and the Morso 8142.....

What stove did you end up going with?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been looking at stoves as well&#8230;.  </p>
<p>I love the Scan 60 and the Morso 8142&#8230;..</p>
<p>What stove did you end up going with?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

